I’ve been saying for years that I’m going to head to attend the Melbourne Writer’s Festival, hob-knob with the literati, maybe see a few authors speak, get some books signed. Literally years, but there’s always been some other distraction. Late last week I signed the JB (he wanted to) and I up for the Festival Lovers Package, which consisted of four one hour sessions.
We started at 1pm in the BMW Edge Theatre with the Elizabeth Jolley Lecture chaired by Jan McGuinness and conducted by Brian Dibble, Jolleys’ biographer. He delivered a pretty thorough lecture, I haven’t read a lot of Elizabeth Jolley so it was interesting to hear about her from a personal perspective, some of the influences for her writing and why she tackled some of the more controversial topics that she did. Considering she wasn’t published for the first time until her 50’s and went on to become a well known and respected author is quite a feat. My only criticism is that Dibble spoke quite fast and in a thick American accent and when people asked questions at the end he seemed to struggle with some of the answers. It was okay though, we both walked out with more knowledge than when we walked in.
The next session was across the way at ACMI. The session titled Visions of the City was chaired by Rjurik Davidson (Overland) and included China Meiville, Margo Lanagan and Jack Dann as the panelists. Both the JB and I felt this was probably the worst session we attended for the day; the authors just seemed to make it all too intellectual and went off in too many tangents. It made me realise that a good panel/session is really dependent on who is chairing. The chair needs to ask good questions to get the panel thinking and then manipulate the discussion so that it stays on topic and gets the best out of each speaker. Davidson introduced each author (by name only, and not by their publications which was not helpful for the JB and I who hadn’t read them) and then just sat, nodding at each comment. At points when the discussion dried up he sat and nodded rather than grasping the subject and leading it on. He seemed unprepared. I thought Margo Lanagan was the best on the panel, relaxed, straight to the point and quite funny. China seemed to take himself too seriously (talked more about movies than books which the JB and I found a little odd) and I just didn’t get anything that Jack was saying. He made the least sense. So quite disappointing.
Our third session for the day was titled Our Restless Life hosted by another Overlander, Kalinda Ashton and the two panelists were John Carroll and Brigid Delany. Carroll is a Sociologist and Peter Garrett look-a-like who delivered quite an interesting talk on how society is not really changing that much we just think it is. He referred to stats and pulled on numerous sources, historic and current day, to make his points. He was quite interesting, although I think the panel form of discussion didn’t really suit his style; I think he’d be better using the lecture form of presenting. Delany who has just launched a book on how restless society is in terms of love and work spoke well enough, but I found her subject matter a little whiny. She talked of how these days people are inclined to use speed dating and on-line social networking sites to partner; how today people are more inclined to contract which means they don’t grow in a professional sense or establish quality working relationships. I went in to the Readings bookshop at Fed Square afterwards thinking I’d collect a copy of Carrolls’ book, Ego and Soul, although the tiny shop was so packed and I just needed to get some air. Most people headed straight for Delany’s book but she seemed the less interesting of the two to us. The JB summed her up as a jack of all trades but master of none. Ashton was a good chair, she introduced both authors and set good parameters for the discussion.
The final and best session for the day was Sonya Hartnett in conversation with Sally Warhaft (formerly of The Monthly). Any would-be chairs really ought to go and see Warhaft in action; this woman knows how to lead a discussion, how to engage with her subject and the audience. Really fantastic. And as for Hartnett, you don’t get many authors these days who are so honest, realistic and up front about everything including her use of Botox. Hartnett was the recipient of the Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award which has really cemented her reputation as an internationally acclaimed author. She discussed the good and bad associated with winning such a prize, the challenges of being an Australian author who publishes for young and adult audiences and how her creative process works. I have read Landscape with Animals and Of a Boy by Hartnett, both great books in different ways, for my money. It was without doubt a fantastic conversation to be a part of. Sonya was charming, friendly, warm and honest. Warhaft really got the best out of Hartnett and that’s what made this one of the best ‘in conversation’ sessions I’ve ever seen. I would have paid the $50 that we paid for the 4 sessions just to see Hartnett and Warhaft for an hour. Excellent.
So we left Fed Square last night thinking it was great to do something different. We both learned new and different things although if we do the MWF again I’ll probably look more closely at the sessions I’m more interested in seeing. The Festival runs for a few another week or so but due to work and other commitments we won’t get there again this time around.
Posted by yappingdog 
Posted by yappingdog 
Posted by yappingdog